Skip to content
PeptideAI
Human RCTfat lossmuscle growth

Eloralintide

Eli Lilly's selective amylin receptor agonist, which produced roughly 20% weight loss in phase 2 with a strikingly clean gastrointestinal profile.

Also known as selective amylin receptor agonist, LY3841136

Human RCTRandomised controlled trials in humans, but not an approved product for this use.

A phase 2 trial reported around 20.1% mean weight loss at 48 weeks at the top dose with tolerability far better than incretins - a genuinely striking result, but one dataset from one sponsor, not yet a phase 3 programme with published outcomes.

How it works

Eloralintide is designed as a receptor-selective amylin agonist - it targets AMY receptor complexes preferentially rather than binding the calcitonin receptor with equal affinity as cagrilintide does. The rationale is that some of the nausea and gastrointestinal burden of amylin analogues comes from calcitonin receptor activation, so selectivity should decouple satiety from sickness. The phase 2 results support that hypothesis: weight loss in the region of 20% at 48 weeks with no clear plateau, and tolerability far better than any incretin at comparable efficacy. It remains phase 2 data from a single programme, with no published long-term safety.

Targets: Amylin receptors (AMY1-3)

Dosing

ProtocolDoseFrequencyRoute
Phase 2 obesity dosingSame day each week.once weeklysubcutaneous
  • · Phase 2 tested a range of escalating once-weekly doses over 48 weeks, with the highest arm reaching about 20.1% mean weight loss. The full dose-arm details have not been published in a peer-reviewed paper, so specific milligram figures are deliberately omitted here.

Titration

Stepped weekly escalation was used. Tolerability appears to be much less limiting than for incretins.

Cycling

Developed as chronic therapy; no cycling data.

Work out your exact syringe units →

Pharmacology

Half-life
Supports once-weekly dosing; precise human half-life not published.
Onset
Weight loss was still accruing at 48 weeks in phase 2.
Routes
subcutaneous
Molecule
Long-acting selective amylin receptor agonist peptide

Handling

Diluent
Bacteriostatic water for research-grade material
Typical mix
1 or 2 mL
Lyophilised
Refrigerate at 2-8 C.
Reconstituted
Refrigerated, use within about 28 days.
Light sensitive
Yes — keep it out of the light

Mixing

Handle as an aggregation-prone amylin analogue: swirl, do not shake, inspect before use.

Side effects

  • commonNauseaSubstantially lower rates than GLP-1 agonists at comparable weight loss.
  • uncommonVomiting
  • uncommonInjection-site reaction

Do not use if

  • Pregnancy.
  • Long-term human safety is unestablished - this is phase 2 material with no registration file behind it.

Combining it

  • synergytirzepatideLilly is developing eloralintide in combination with tirzepatide; separate receptors, additive effect.
  • redundantcagrilintideBoth target the amylin axis.

What to monitor

  • · Weight and body composition.
  • · Protein intake.
  • · Standard metabolic panel.

Legal status

Investigational; not approved anywhere and not legitimately available.

References

  • Eli Lilly 2025-2026, eloralintide phase 2 obesity results (trial)

Mechanism in depth

Eloralintide is the strongest current test of the hypothesis that amylin selectivity buys tolerability without costing efficacy, and the phase 2 result is the most striking single dataset in the amylin field: roughly 20% mean weight loss at 48 weeks, which is tirzepatide territory, with a gastrointestinal profile reported as far cleaner than incretins produce. If that replicates in phase 3 it changes the shape of the field, because it means the nausea that has defined obesity pharmacotherapy for fifteen years was an artefact of which receptor was being hit rather than an unavoidable cost of appetite suppression. The mechanistic story is the same as petrelintide's - selective agonism at the calcitonin-receptor-plus-RAMP amylin complexes, with minimal engagement of the bare calcitonin receptor - executed by a different sponsor with apparently better results. The caveats are real and should be stated plainly. This is one phase 2 dataset from one sponsor, without an independent head-to-head, without long-term safety, and without any published mechanism for why eloralintide should be twice as effective as petrelintide when both are described as selective amylin agonists. Twenty percent from a mechanism that produced 10.8% (cagrilintide) and 10.7% (petrelintide) in comparable trials is a large enough discrepancy to warrant scepticism until phase 3 reads out.

What usually goes wrong

There is no legitimate supply, so the practical failure is buying something labelled eloralintide from a research chemical vendor and receiving cagrilintide, or a peptide of no identity at all. The scientific caution is that a single phase 2 dataset reporting 20% from a mechanism that produced half that in two comparable programmes is a result to hold loosely until it replicates.

Bloodwork worth running

MarkerWhenWhy it matters
Body composition by DEXABaseline and every 3-4 months.Twenty percent weight loss produces meaningful absolute lean-mass loss even if amylin spares it proportionally better than incretins.Act if: No established threshold.
HbA1c and fasting glucoseBaseline and 3-monthly.Amylin agonism suppresses postprandial glucagon and slows gastric emptying, both of which lower glucose.Act if: Hypoglycaemia on background insulin means cut the insulin.
Calcium and bone turnover markersBaseline and annually.The class-wide unresolved question, even for selective agonists.Act if: No established threshold.

Pharmacokinetics

Crosses blood-brain barrier
partial
Accumulates
Yes — doses stack before steady state
Metabolism
Not verified.
Elimination
Not verified.

Receptor targets

  • Amylin receptors (AMY1R, AMY2R, AMY3R)Not verified; characterised in the literature as selective for amylin receptors

    Area postrema satiation, slowed gastric emptying and postprandial glucagon suppression, with weekly duration and reportedly minimal nausea.

  • Calcitonin receptor (CTR)Reported as minimal - this is the design point

    Low engagement, which is the proposed explanation for the tolerability profile.

Trials

  • Eloralintide phase 2 Phase 2 · 48 weeks · 2025

    Mean weight reduction reported at approximately 20% at the top dose over 48 weeks, with tolerability substantially better than incretin comparators.

  • Eloralintide phase 1 proof of concept Phase 1 · 2026

    Safety, tolerability and initial weight-loss signal for a selective long-acting amylin receptor agonist.

What to expect, and when

Weight loss was still accruing at 48 weeks in phase 2. Onset and steady-state timing are not published in verified form.

Stacking and comparisons

Lilly's stated intent is to develop eloralintide both alone and combined with tirzepatide, which is the mechanistically obvious pairing and the one thing that could plausibly push weight loss past 30% with tolerable side effects. No combination data has been published. Outside a trial there is no supply, so any stacking discussion is hypothetical.

Against petrelintide and cagrilintide: roughly double the reported weight loss from the same nominal mechanism, which is either a genuinely better molecule or a result that will regress. Against tirzepatide: comparable reported efficacy with substantially better tolerability, which would be a very significant improvement if it survives phase 3. Against semaglutide: better on both axes in cross-trial comparison, which is the weakest form of comparison available. The correct posture is interest, not conviction.

Rough cost

Investigational; no legitimate supply and no price.

Genuinely uncertain

  • No verified pharmacokinetic parameters.
  • Participant numbers and exact dose levels for the phase 2 trial were not extracted in this session.
  • The reason eloralintide would be roughly twice as effective as other selective amylin agonists is not explained anywhere and may not survive replication.
  • No long-term safety data of any kind.
  • Sequence and structure are not published in verifiable detail.

Papers